Environmental Sustainability and Environmental-Economic Outcomes in India: An Empirical Synthesis

1. Overview and Comparative Positioning

India combines relatively low per-capita resource use with very high aggregate environmental pressures, reflected in a rank of 176 out of 180 countries in the 2024 Environmental Performance Index (EPI), with especially poor scores in air quality, emissions and biodiversity–habitat protection. Despite some improvements in specific indicators—such as reduced household air pollution and modest gains in forest and tree cover—overall environmental health outcomes remain weak relative to peer emerging economies, and environmental risks increasingly feed back into public health, agricultural productivity and economic output. Cross-country indices like ND‑GAIN place India in the middle of the global distribution on climate vulnerability and adaptation readiness, implying substantial exposure to climate hazards combined with only moderate institutional capacity to manage them.[^1][2][^3][4][^5][6][^7][8]

2. Air Quality, Atmospheric Pollution and Health–Economic Links

Long‑term reanalysis shows that annual mean PM2.5 concentrations in India rose steadily between the late 1990s and around 2014–2016, with a large share of the population chronically exposed to levels far above national and WHO guidelines, especially in the Indo‑Gangetic Plain and Delhi where annual means exceeded 100 μg/m³. While more recent years show modest improvements in some regions due to fuel and vehicle standards and the National Clean Air Programme, exposure remains extremely high, and India ranks 177th on the EPI air-quality subindex. Sectoral attribution studies (GBD‑MAPS) estimate that roughly four‑fifths of ambient PM2.5 is driven by combustion of coal, oil products, biomass and waste across power, industry, transport, residential energy and open burning, with prominent urban–rural and seasonal (winter and post‑monsoon) spikes tied to inversion conditions and crop‑residue burning in the north.[^2][3][^9][4]

The Global Burden of Disease 2019 assessment attributes about 1.67 million deaths in India in 2019—roughly 18 percent of all deaths—to ambient and household air pollution combined, with ambient PM2.5‑attributable deaths increasing more than 100 percent since 1990 even as household‑air‑pollution deaths declined due to cleaner cooking fuels. Air pollution accounts for about 11–12 percent of total disability‑adjusted life‑years (DALYs) in India, and macroeconomic estimates suggest output losses of around 1.3–1.4 percent of national GDP in 2019 from premature mortality and morbidity, with higher relative burdens in poorer, more polluted northern states and very high per‑capita losses in Delhi. Recent state‑level analyses find a strong positive association between ambient‑pollution‑attributed disease burden and growth in motor vehicles and industrial activity, and generally a negative (though not always linear) relationship between air‑pollution DALYs per capita and gross state domestic product, indicating that richer states can partly mitigate exposure but not eliminate it.[^5][^10][^11][^12][^13]

Causally, quasi‑experimental and econometric studies using satellite data and variation in pollution across time and space link PM2.5 exposure in India to elevated risks of lower respiratory infections, COPD, ischemic heart disease, stroke, diabetes and adverse neonatal outcomes, supporting a steep exposure–response curve even at very high concentrations. Productivity studies, largely extrapolating from international evidence but reinforced by Indian urban data, find that high particulate levels reduce labor productivity through illness, cognitive impairment and heat‑synergy effects, implying that improved air quality could yield sizable gains in urban economic output and in human capital formation.[^10][12][^2][5]

3. Water Quality, Water Stress and Sectoral Outcomes

India is classified as a highly water‑stressed country: FAO Aquastat‑based assessments report annual per‑capita renewable freshwater availability around 1,400 m³—below the conventional water‑stress threshold—and SDG indicator 6.4.2 puts national water stress (withdrawals as a share of renewable resources) in the high‑stress band at roughly two‑thirds. National assessments emphasize that 66 percent of available water resources are already abstracted, with unsustainable groundwater use in northwestern agricultural belts and in many cities, and major river basins like the Ganges and Brahmaputra simultaneously facing monsoon flood risk and dry‑season shortages due to over‑abstraction and inadequate storage. NITI Aayog’s Composite Water Management Index highlights severe intra‑state heterogeneity, with some large economic contributors such as Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Delhi scoring poorly on water management despite their importance for agriculture and GDP.[^14][15][^16][17][^18][19]

On access, India has expanded improved drinking‑water coverage substantially, and several states report near‑universal access to “safe” tap connections through schemes such as Jal Jeevan Mission, but quality problems persist: government and NGO reports suggest that roughly half of reported morbidity in India is linked to poor water quality, and a substantial share of surface and groundwater—up to about 70 percent in some assessments—is contaminated by pathogens or chemicals such as fluoride, arsenic and iron. WaterAid estimates that tens of millions of Indians are affected annually by waterborne disease, with millions of child diarrhoea cases and large associated productivity and schooling losses, implying a direct channel from water quality to human capital and growth.[^20][^21][^22]

Causal evidence on water pollution and agriculture is growing: a recent spatial discontinuity study of 48 “severely polluted” industrial river stretches finds that downstream villages with canal or river irrigation or shallow groundwater experience significantly higher groundwater contamination and crop‑yield losses of around 10 percent, demonstrating that industrial water pollution can materially depress agricultural output in affected command areas. Economic evaluations of drinking‑water contamination document large health and time costs, and suggest substantial willingness‑to‑pay for reliable safe water, implying that improved wastewater treatment, industrial effluent control and rural water‑quality management could generate high social returns.[^23][^22][^20]

4. Agricultural Sustainability, Soil, Groundwater and Climate Resilience

Decades of input‑intensive agriculture have degraded Indian soils through nutrient mining, salinization, erosion and loss of soil organic carbon, with national reviews estimating that close to 30 percent of land is degraded and Soil Health Card data indicating that fewer than 5 percent of samples have adequate nitrogen and that fertilizer response ratios have fallen sharply since the Green Revolution. Fertilizer use is both intensive and imbalanced: the average N:P:K application ratio in many regions is near 7.7:3.1:1 versus a recommended 4:2:1, contributing to micronutrient deficiencies, water pollution and nitrous‑oxide emissions, while pesticide use has raised concerns about ecological and health impacts. Empirical agronomic literature associates conservation agriculture practices, integrated nutrient management, crop diversification and organic amendments with improved soil structure, water‑holding capacity and yield stability, but adoption is uneven and often constrained by small landholdings, risk and extension gaps.[^24][^25][^26][^27][^28]

Groundwater depletion is a critical constraint: GRACE satellite studies show very rapid declines in groundwater storage in northwestern India over the 2000s, with cumulative losses on the order of 100+ km³ in six years driven largely by irrigation for rice and wheat. Recent climate–water research finds that farmers respond to warming temperatures by increasing groundwater pumping to offset crop water stress, a form of autonomous adaptation that accelerates depletion and could triple net groundwater‑loss rates by 2041–2080, threatening future cropping intensity and yields for the one‑third of India’s population dependent on irrigated agriculture. Together, soil degradation and groundwater mining raise the risk that current yield levels in key breadbaskets are not sustainable without major changes in cropping patterns, irrigation efficiency and soil and water management.[^29][^17][^18][^30][^31]

Empirical work on climate‑resilient agriculture in India shows that practices such as zero tillage, laser land levelling, drip irrigation, drought‑tolerant varieties and diversified integrated farming systems can maintain or increase yields while reducing water and input use and enhancing resilience to rainfall and temperature shocks, though scaling remains limited and benefits are heterogeneous across agro‑ecological zones. Studies combining historical yield data with climate variables project that climate change could reduce yields of rice and wheat by up to about 20 percent by mid‑century in the absence of adaptation, underscoring that long‑term agricultural productivity is tightly linked to soil and water stewardship and broader mitigation and adaptation policies.[^8][27][^28][29]

5. Biodiversity, Forests, Ecosystems and Resilience

The India State of Forest Report 2023 estimates that total forest and tree cover now spans about 8.27 lakh km² (25.17 percent of India’s area), with forest cover proper at roughly 21.8 percent and small net increases in recent years; however, much of this gain is in open forests and plantations rather than dense natural forests. Mangrove cover has also grown modestly to just under 5,000 km², and bamboo‑bearing area remains extensive, but spatial analyses highlight continued fragmentation and pressure in biodiversity‑rich regions such as the North‑East, Western Ghats and Andaman & Nicobar Islands. Conservation‑planning research notes that less than 5 percent of India’s land is effectively protected for conservation and that only around 15 percent of spatially identified priority biodiversity and ecosystem‑service landscapes fall within the existing protected‑area network, leaving many high‑value habitats unprotected or poorly managed.[^32][6][^33][34][^35][36]

Valuation studies for ecosystem services estimate large economic values: one World Bank‑sponsored assessment put the central estimate of ecosystem‑service flows from selected Indian ecosystems at about 3 percent of GDP in 2009, and more recent work suggests that habitat and biodiversity services from forests alone may be worth several hundred billion dollars annually when including regulating and supporting services. Case studies such as the economic valuation of New Delhi’s National Zoological Park, which finds an annual ecosystem‑service value of more than INR 400 crore dominated by recreational and cultural benefits, illustrate the magnitude of non‑market values and the potential losses from habitat degradation or conversion. Ecological and economic research links intact ecosystems and biodiversity to greater resilience against floods, droughts, heat and vector‑borne disease spread, implying that continued habitat loss and fragmentation can amplify climate‑related damages and undermine long‑term development resilience.[^37][^38][^35][^36][^39]

6. Climate Risk Exposure, Vulnerability and Adaptation Capacity

India ranks among the top ten countries globally in long‑term climate‑risk indices such as Germanwatch’s Climate Risk Index, reflecting high exposure to floods, cyclones, heatwaves and droughts and large associated mortality and economic losses. Over 1995–2024, India’s long‑term CRI rank is around ninth, and in 2024 it was fifteenth in annual ranking, with around 430 recorded extreme weather events and estimated losses of roughly USD 170 billion over three decades, and India consistently appearing among the top three countries by number of people affected in recent years. Climate‑risk country profiles and ND‑GAIN scores emphasize high vulnerability in food, water, health and ecosystem services, combined with moderate readiness scores that have improved over time but remain constrained by infrastructure deficits and institutional capacity gaps.[^40][^41][^42][^43][^7][^44][^8]

Climate‑sensitive sectors show strong impacts: agronomic studies project yield declines for major crops under warming and altered monsoon patterns, while empirical analyses document substantial damages from individual droughts and floods to agricultural output, rural incomes and food prices in affected states. Heat‑stress metrics indicate rapidly increasing exposure of urban and rural populations to dangerous heat indices, compounding air‑pollution impacts and straining public health systems and labor productivity, particularly in outdoor and informal work. Disaster‑risk‑management capacity has improved via early‑warning systems, evacuation infrastructure and cyclone shelters, reducing mortality in some events, but large adaptation gaps remain in urban drainage, coastal protection, climate‑resilient agriculture and health‑system preparedness.[^7][27][^29][8]

7. Resource Use Efficiency, Emissions Intensity and Circularity

India’s energy intensity of GDP has been declining according to World Bank–IEA data, reflecting structural change, energy‑efficiency improvements and policy measures, yet remains higher than many service‑oriented economies and is constrained by continued reliance on coal for power. CO₂‑emissions intensity (per unit of GDP) has fallen relative to 2005, consistent with India’s Nationally Determined Contribution targets, but total greenhouse‑gas emissions continue to rise, with major contributions from power, industry, transport and agriculture and growing emissions from transport and industrial processes documented in EDGAR and World Bank datasets. Material and waste‑management indicators show rising municipal solid‑waste generation and limited recycling and circular‑economy uptake, although there has been progress in policies on plastics, e‑waste and extended producer responsibility.[^45][^46][^47][^48][^49]

Water‑use efficiency varies widely across sectors and states; agriculture accounts for the majority of withdrawals and often exhibits low conveyance and application efficiency, while industry and urban sectors have made more progress through metering and recycling, but overall improvements are offset by rising demand. Resource‑productivity and circular‑economy indicators for India lag far behind advanced economies but are improving slowly as renewable energy expands, energy‑efficiency schemes scale up and pilot circular‑economy models emerge in sectors like metals, cement and urban waste, though comprehensive quantitative benchmarking against peers remains limited by data gaps.[^15][46][^49][19][^14][45]

Empirical macro‑studies suggest that improvements in resource efficiency and reduced emissions intensity can coexist with robust GDP growth and may be supportive of competitiveness when they lower input costs, reduce health burdens and open access to green‑finance and export markets, but distributional and transition‑cost issues (e.g., in coal‑dependent regions) pose significant political‑economy challenges.[^49][^50][^45]

8. Public Health and Economic Impacts of Environmental Degradation

Beyond air and water pollution, environmental risks—heat stress, unsafe water and sanitation, vector‑borne disease linked to ecosystem disturbance and climate change, and chemical exposure—collectively impose large health burdens that interact with poverty and undernutrition. Estimates for waterborne disease alone suggest tens of millions of annual cases, more than a million child diarrhoea deaths historically and economic losses on the order of hundreds of millions of dollars per year, with disproportionate impacts on rural poor and peri‑urban slums. Climate‑health projections based on ND‑GAIN components indicate that India faces high projected increases in climate‑change‑induced disease burdens and vector‑borne infections, exacerbated by infrastructure and health‑system gaps despite improvements in medical staff and sanitation access.[^51][^44][^12][^22][^5][^7][^10]

The Lancet Planetary Health GBD 2019 study estimates that air‑pollution‑related morbidity and mortality alone cost India about USD 36.8 billion in 2019—roughly 1.36 percent of GDP—with state‑level losses ranging up to over 2 percent of GSDP in some poorer, highly polluted states. These losses arise from reduced labor supply, lower labor productivity, higher health‑care spending and foregone human capital formation, and are additive to climate‑related disaster losses and agricultural damages, implying that environmental degradation is a material macroeconomic drag rather than a marginal externality. Distinguishing correlation from causation, the strongest causal evidence exists for specific channels—such as air pollution’s impact on cardiopulmonary and neonatal outcomes and industrial water pollution’s effect on crop yields—where quasi‑experimental designs and detailed exposure–outcome modeling have been applied; for broader macro‑productivity and growth effects, evidence remains more correlational but increasingly consistent in direction and magnitude.[^11][^12][^13][^2][^5][^10][^23]

9. Environmental Governance, Institutions and Enforcement

India has a wide‑ranging environmental regulatory framework—anchored in the Environment (Protection) Act, Air and Water Acts, various waste‑management rules and biodiversity legislation—with national‑level oversight by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change and implementation primarily by the Central and State Pollution Control Boards (CPCB and SPCBs). Systematic reviews of environmental governance highlight that while the legal framework is relatively comprehensive, enforcement is hampered by diffuse institutional responsibilities, legal delays, weak liability systems and significant information and capacity constraints. Detailed studies of SPCBs across multiple states find chronic understaffing—especially of technical positions—high vacancy rates, limited training, inadequate monitoring equipment, and financial constraints that limit inspection frequency, data collection and enforcement, which have become more acute as their mandates have expanded to cover air, water, hazardous waste, noise and climate‑related tasks.[^52][^53][^54][^55][^56]

Recent analyses also document innovation and gradual strengthening: several SPCBs have adopted IT tools for online consent management and emissions reporting, process optimization, public‑facing air‑quality apps and collaborative research with academic institutions, and some have experimented with financial incentives to accelerate technology upgrading in sectors like brick kilns. Empirical evaluations of specific regulatory interventions—notably an experiment on third‑party auditor incentives in Gujarat—show that tightening monitoring and aligning auditor incentives led to more truthful reporting and lower non‑compliance, providing causal evidence that institutional design can materially improve environmental outcomes even within existing legal frameworks. Overall, the literature indicates that regulatory design on paper is often more ambitious than enforcement realities, and that strengthening frontline regulators’ human, financial and technical capacity is a binding constraint for environmental performance.[^53][^54][^57]

10. Market‑Based Environmental Instruments and Incentives

India has implemented several market‑based or incentive‑based instruments, including the Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) scheme for industrial energy efficiency, Renewable Energy Certificates, pilot emissions‑trading schemes for particulate pollution, and is in the process of developing a national emissions‑trading framework through the Indian Carbon Market. Evaluations of PAT suggest that while it has contributed to some energy‑intensity reductions, the overall greenhouse‑gas reductions have been modest due to lenient targets, excess generation of energy‑saving certificates (ESCerts), low trading volumes and weak penalties for non‑compliance, underscoring the importance of robust target‑setting and measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) systems. Firm‑level financial studies indicate that participation in PAT and similar schemes can, under some conditions, enhance firm value by signaling environmental responsibility and driving efficiency investments, but impacts are heterogeneous across sectors and depend on design details.[^58][^57][^59][^60][^61]

Pilot particulate‑matter emissions‑trading schemes in states like Gujarat have been rigorously evaluated and found to improve compliance by correcting perverse incentives in third‑party monitoring and by allowing plants to achieve ambient‑air standards at lower cost compared with command‑and‑control approaches, providing rare causal evidence of cost‑effective pollution reduction through trading in a low‑ and middle‑income context. More broadly, India’s environmental tax and subsidy system still contains significant misaligned incentives—including continued support for fossil fuels and power and irrigation subsidies that encourage water overuse—although there has been some rebalancing toward renewable‑energy support and removal of the worst distortions, and empirical work on these price signals shows strong effects on resource use behavior.[^19][57][^45][49]

11. Growth–Environment Trade‑offs, Decoupling and EKC Evidence

Time‑series and cointegration studies modelling carbon emissions, energy use and GDP for India generally find evidence consistent with an Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) for CO₂—an inverted‑U‑shaped relationship between income and emissions intensity—once structural breaks and energy use are controlled for, although the turning point is at relatively high income levels and aggregate emissions continue to rise. These studies show that carbon emissions are highly elastic with respect to per‑capita income and energy consumption, and in some specifications trade openness contributes to emissions reduction in the long run, suggesting that without very strong policy intervention, growth will remain carbon‑intensive for the foreseeable future. More recent decomposition analyses highlight emerging but partial decoupling of emissions from GDP growth in specific sectors—especially where renewables and efficiency gains are strongest—but not yet at the scale required for absolute national‑level decoupling.[^62][63][^64][50]

From a descriptive perspective, India’s aggregate emissions and pollution indicators have worsened with rapid industrialization and urbanization, but some environmental health indicators (household air pollution, access to clean water, sanitation, and aspects of forest cover) have improved alongside growth, indicating that income gains have financed both pollution and environmental improvements, with the net effect depending heavily on policy and technology choices. Empirically, strong causal evidence exists that more stringent and well‑enforced environmental regulations and targeted investments (e.g., in clean energy, transport, wastewater treatment, soil restoration) can mitigate the traditional growth–environment trade‑off, enabling “grow clean” trajectories in specific sectors, but large‑scale national decoupling remains a work in progress rather than an established fact.[^6][57][^61][2][^5][45][^8][58]

12. Reform Mechanisms, Policy Design and Institutional Effectiveness

Evidence on what works in India’s environmental policy points toward a combination of regulatory strengthening, incentive alignment and technological upgrading rather than any single silver bullet. Evaluations of regulatory reforms—such as improved auditor incentives, online consent and monitoring systems, and more data‑driven target‑setting—show that relatively low‑cost institutional design changes can yield significant gains in compliance and environmental outcomes when coupled with credible enforcement and transparency. Energy‑efficiency and emissions‑trading policies like PAT and pilot particulate‑trading schemes reveal that market‑based instruments can be effective, but only when supported by rigorous MRV, ambitious yet realistic targets, adequate penalties, and mechanisms to avoid persistent over‑allocation of credits.[^65][^66][^54][^57][^59][^60][^61][^53][^58]

In agriculture, policy pilots and programs promoting micro‑irrigation, climate‑resilient seeds, integrated nutrient management and conservation agriculture have demonstrated improvements in water use efficiency, yields and resilience, but scaling is constrained by credit access, risk perceptions, extension capacity and fragmented landholdings. Urban environmental‑management reforms—such as improved solid‑waste segregation and treatment, public transport investments, and city‑level clean‑air plans—have achieved localized improvements but face coordination and financing challenges across jurisdictions and agencies. Climate‑adaptation policy frameworks increasingly emphasize mainstreaming resilience into infrastructure, health and social‑protection systems, yet empirical evaluations of adaptation projects’ effectiveness remain sparse, representing a key research gap despite high estimated potential benefits.[^25][^27][^28][^2][^65][^7][^53][^8][^24]

13. Structural Constraints and Institutional Bottlenecks

Several structural factors limit India’s environmental sustainability: high population density, a large agrarian workforce dependent on land and water, heavy reliance on coal and biomass, rapid urbanization with infrastructure deficits, and limited fiscal and administrative capacity at sub‑national levels. These structural features make it harder to achieve environmental targets at low cost and increase the salience of distributional and just‑transition concerns, particularly for coal regions, small farmers and informal workers exposed to pollution and climate risk. Institutional bottlenecks—including under‑resourced SPCBs, fragmented mandates, inconsistent data and limited evaluation culture—impede feedback loops between policy design, implementation and empirical learning, slowing iterative improvement of environmental governance.[^54][55][^56][12][^27][1][^14][5][^29][52][^53][8]

Market and governance failures also interact: energy and water subsidies, incomplete property rights over groundwater, weak environmental liability regimes and information asymmetries reduce private incentives to invest in cleaner technologies or conservation, while political economy factors often favor short‑term growth and employment over long‑term ecological health. Addressing these constraints requires coordinated reforms in pricing, regulation, social protection and public investment that explicitly integrate environmental externalities into development planning.[^17][18][^45][19]

14. Data Limitations, Measurement Uncertainty and Research Gaps

Despite substantial progress in data and research, major gaps remain in measuring and attributing India’s environmental performance and its economic and health impacts: air‑pollution exposure estimates rely on satellite‑model fusion and sparse ground monitoring, with uncertainties at high concentrations and in rural areas; water‑quality data are fragmented, with many small water bodies and rural sources poorly monitored; and biodiversity indicators are incomplete, especially for invertebrates and non‑forest ecosystems. Many cross‑country indices (EPI, ND‑GAIN, CRI) are sensitive to indicator choices, weights and modeling assumptions, so rankings should be interpreted as indicative of relative performance rather than precise scores, and differences across years often reflect methodology changes as much as real trends. Reliable, long‑term time series on material flows, circular‑economy indicators, sub‑national resource productivity and enforcement actions are limited, constraining rigorous evaluation of resource‑efficiency and governance reforms.[^67][^3][^35][^39][^1][^2][^14][^7][^8]

From an empirical‑economics perspective, there is relatively rich causal evidence for some pollution‑health and water‑pollution–agriculture channels and for specific regulatory experiments, but far fewer quasi‑experimental studies on questions such as the long‑run productivity impacts of soil‑restoration programs, the labor‑productivity effects of heat and pollution in Indian workplaces, the distributional impacts of environmental taxes and subsidy reforms, or the cost‑effectiveness of large‑scale adaptation investments. Strengthening administrative data systems, investing in environmental monitoring and fostering closer collaboration between regulators and researchers would help fill these gaps and enable more evidence‑based environmental policy.[^57][^12][^2][^5][^23]

15. Synthesis: Interactions Between Environment, Health, Agriculture and Growth

Empirical evidence for India shows that environmental quality is not a peripheral concern but a central determinant of health, agricultural sustainability and economic performance: air and water pollution alone account for well over 10 percent of the national disease burden and impose annual economic losses exceeding 1 percent of GDP, while soil degradation and groundwater depletion threaten long‑term productivity in key agricultural regions. Climate risks compound these pressures through more frequent and intense extremes that damage infrastructure, depress yields and harm vulnerable populations, with India ranking among the world’s most climate‑affected nations despite moderate improvements in resilience indices. At the same time, carefully designed environmental policies—combining stronger enforcement, market‑based incentives, investment in clean technology and ecosystem conservation, and targeted support for vulnerable groups—have demonstrated the potential to reduce environmental harms without derailing growth, especially when aligned with broader structural transformation toward services and higher‑value, less resource‑intensive activities.[^41][42][^43][61][^35][14][^5][29][^17][45][^7][8][^10][58][^11][57][^24][25]

The existing empirical literature therefore supports a view of India’s environmental sustainability challenge as one of managing a complex portfolio of interlinked risks and co‑benefits rather than a simple growth–environment trade‑off: strengthening environmental governance, correcting price distortions, investing in natural and human capital, and scaling proven mitigation and adaptation technologies are central to sustaining both economic development and long‑term resource availability.

---

References

1. Deciphering India's 176th Global Rank in the Environmental ... - India’s Environmental Performance Index (EPI) ranking has sharply declined, standing at 176th out of...

2. Evolution of India's PM 2.5 pollution between 1998 and 2020 ...

3. Environmental Performance Index 2024 - Drishti IAS - The Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy and the Columbia Center for International Earth Sci...

4. Environment Performance Index 2024: India Ranks 176 out of 180 ...

5. Health and economic impact of air pollution in the states of India - The association of air pollution with multiple adverse health outcomes is becoming well established,...

6. India's forest cover increases by 1,445 square km, ISFR 2023 shows

7. India - The ND-GAIN Country Index, a project of the University of Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative (N...

8. CLIMATE RISK COUNTRY PROFILE

9. [PDF] Evolution of India's PM2.5 pollution between 1998 and 2020 using ...

10. Health and economic impact of air pollution in the states ... - by A Pandey · 2021 · Cited by 701 — With air pollution responsible for 11·5% of the disease burden (...

11. 1

12. Air pollution attributed disease burden and economic ... - Air pollution is one of the major contributors to the disease burden in India after malnutrition. We...

13. Air pollution attributed disease burden and economic ... - by BS Bagepally · 2022 · Cited by 18 — The cited study reported about 1.36 % of India's GDP (i.e., 3...

14. India Water Resources Profile Overview - Winrock International

15. Indicator Explorer - Sovereign ESG Data Portal - World Bank

16. Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion ... - Free and open access to global development data

17. GRACE reveals groundwater depletion in India - Over the six year period of the study, the groundwater depletion was. 109 cubic km, roughly double t...

18. Indian groundwater depletion rates could triple in coming ... - The rate of groundwater loss could triple by 2080, further threatening India's food and water securi...

19. Composite Water Management Index - the population, _{40% of agricultural produce, and} 35% of economic output1 of India.2. High-performe...

20. Agriculture Water Pollution in India – A Silent Alarm and Policy

21. Impact of Water Quality on Human Health - India is agrarian economy and for irrigation government is providing subsidies for pumping the groun...

22. Drinking water quality in rural India: Issues and approaches - Health and Economic Burden. Health and Economic Burden. Poor water quality spreads disease, causes d...

23. Industrial Water Pollution and Agricultural Production in India - by N Hagerty · 2024 · Cited by 5 — This paper studies the effects of industrial water pollution on a...

24. Building soil resilience: pathways to sustainable agriculture ... - This review examines the current status of soil health in India's varied climatic zones, with partic...

25. Soil Health Crisis and India's Path to Recovery - India's soils are rapidly degrading, with declining nutrient levels and fertilizer efficiency droppi...

26. Soil Health in India: Building the Foundation for ... - India's farming future depends on healthy soil. Explore the urgent challenges, innovative solutions,...

27. Climate-Resilient Agriculture in India: UPSC Current Affairs - Explore the impact of climate change on Indian agriculture. Understand Climate-Resilient Agriculture...

28. 10 Sustainable Farming Practices for a Greener Future in ... - 10 Sustainable Farming Practices for a Greener Future in India · 1. Conservation Tillage · 2. Agrofo...

29. Warming temperatures exacerbate groundwater depletion rates in India - Increased irrigation in response to warming temperatures has accelerated groundwater depletion rates...

30. Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India - Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India · M. Rodell, I. Velicogna, J. Famigliett...

31. Groundwater variability across India, under contrasting ... - by DK Panda · 2022 · Cited by 25 — 261. Figure 1. Interlinkage of groundwater irrigation, climate an...

32. India State of Forest Report 2023 - India State of Forest Report 2023 (ISFR) is brought out by the Forest Survey of India (FSI) on a bie...

33. Key Insights from 18th Indian State of Forest Report 2023 - Civils Phodo - Explore the highlights of the 18th Indian State of Forest Report 2023, including forest and tree cov...

34. 18th India State of Forest Report 2023 - Drishti IAS - Recently, the Ministry for Environment, Forest and Climate Change released the 18th India State of F...

35. Prioritizing India's landscapes for biodiversity, ecosystem ... - by A Srivathsa · 2023 · Cited by 147 — India houses the second largest human population on the plane...

36. Biodiversity as India's Sustainable Edge - India's natural capital offers immunity from trade wars while providing crucial ecosystem services w...

37. Valuation of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in India

38. Economic Valuation of the Ecosystem Services of National ... - The total economic value of the five ecosystem services is estimated to be INR 422.76 crore and the ...

39. Quantifying habitat and biodiversity services and hotspots ... - by R Pandey · 2024 · Cited by 6 — The annual economic value of habitat, biodiversity and supporting ...

40. India Improves Rank in Global Climate Risk Index 2025 - India has improved its position in the latest Global Climate Risk Index (CRI) released by Germanwatc...

41. Climate Risk Index 2026: India Among Top 10 Climate-Affected Nations

42. Climate Risk Index 2026: India Among Top 10 Climate-Affected ...

43. Climate Risk Index (CRI) 2026 - Drishti IAS - Global warming severely threatens India’s water security, ecosystems, economy, and public health, pl...

44. Climate Change: Impact on Children | 24 Apr 2021

45. Energy Intensive Sectors of the Indian Economy - In the same year,. India's CO2 emissions intensity per unit of GDP, valued at purchasing power parit...

46. Energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP ... - Energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP) - India. Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Prog...

47. Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) ... - Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e) - India from The World Bank: Data.

48. Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes ... - Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e) - India · Carbon dioxide (CO2) em...

49. Energy Statistics India - 2024 - greenhouse gas emissions and the carbon footprint of the energy sector. ... International Energy Age...

50. CARBON EMISSIONS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN INDIA - Finally, we can appeal many research and studies that verify and show the existence of the Environme...

51. Climate Change: Impact on Children - Climate Change: Impact on Children

52. Environmental Governance and State Pollution Control ... - by M Mishra · Cited by 1 — The functions of the Board can be categorised under three main heads name...

53. The State of India's Pollution Control Boards

54. How are State Pollution Boards Innovating for Workload ... - By capturing and promoting these positive strides, the study highlights SPCBs' capacity to adapt, in...

55. The State of India's Pollution Control Boards - Our analysis also raises a number of big picture questions on the current and future financial statu...

56. Environmental Governance in India: A Systematic Review ... - The study will provide greater insight into the efforts done by Government of India for the citizens...

57. Emission Trading in India: A Study of Two Schemes - by KR Bandyopadhyay · 2016 · Cited by 7 — The second scheme known as Perform Achieve and Trade (PAT)...

58. Lessons from PAT scheme can shape Indian carbon market - India is all set to steer towards a regulatory carbon market in the country, ahead of its announceme...

59. Navigating India's Emission Trading System: An analysis of ... - by SN Malode · 2025 · Cited by 1 — India's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) signal a commi...

60. Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) scheme in India - Junction - This paper reviews and compiles the major findings of the literature available on the. Perform Achie...

61. Energy Economics - In. 2012, the government of India introduced the Perform, Achieve, and. Trade (PAT) scheme, a market...

62. Environmental Kuznet's curve for India: Evidence from tests ... - by K Kanjilal · 2013 · Cited by 284 — The study finds that the carbon emission is highly elastic wit...

63. Environmental Kuznets curve and India: Evidence from ... - by J BEHERA · Cited by 3 — In this study, the EKC hypothesis examined the relationship between carbo...

64. Estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve in India and ... - There is a significant relationship between carbon emission, fossil fuel energy consumption, trade o...

65. Environmental Sustainability in India - Environmental sustainability lies at the heart of India’s developmental ambitions in the 21st centur...

66. Available online at: https://jazindia.com

67. Addressing Biases in Ambient PM2.5 Exposure and Associated Health Burden Estimates by Filling Satellite AOD Retrieval Gaps over India